Jetstar
"A Dynamic Model of Consumer Choice to Brand Development"
by John Roberts of the Australian National University and London Business School, Peter Danaher of Melbourne Business School, Alan Simpson of Forethought Research and Ken Roberts of Forethought Research.
This work describes the use of a marketing science model by Jetstar, a subsidiary of Australia's leading airline, QANTAS, to effectively and profitably compete in the low cost carrier marketplace. They trace the evolution of the Jetstar strategy, from a baseline calibration of its initial position, through to its efforts to understand and grow price competitiveness and service parity, followed by a highly focused, cost-effective service delivery strategy. The associated a model incorporates dynamics and also allows for unobserved heterogeneity of both perceptions and importance weights of process attributes. The model permitted Jetstar management not only to see how service design and pricing initiatives shift the perceived performance of Jetstar relative to its competitors, but also how the airline is could shift market preferences in a way that emphasizes the areas in which it has competitive advantage. Jetstar market share went from 14.0% to 18.1% during the first five quarterly waves of the research program. Significant price perception and service level disadvantages were ameliorated. Profit for Jetstar went from $A 87 mm in 2006/07, before the study was commissioned, to $A 115 mm in 2007/08 and $A 137 mm in 2008/09 during a period of major industry losses.
by John Roberts of the Australian National University and London Business School, Peter Danaher of Melbourne Business School, Alan Simpson of Forethought Research and Ken Roberts of Forethought Research.
This work describes the use of a marketing science model by Jetstar, a subsidiary of Australia's leading airline, QANTAS, to effectively and profitably compete in the low cost carrier marketplace. They trace the evolution of the Jetstar strategy, from a baseline calibration of its initial position, through to its efforts to understand and grow price competitiveness and service parity, followed by a highly focused, cost-effective service delivery strategy. The associated a model incorporates dynamics and also allows for unobserved heterogeneity of both perceptions and importance weights of process attributes. The model permitted Jetstar management not only to see how service design and pricing initiatives shift the perceived performance of Jetstar relative to its competitors, but also how the airline is could shift market preferences in a way that emphasizes the areas in which it has competitive advantage. Jetstar market share went from 14.0% to 18.1% during the first five quarterly waves of the research program. Significant price perception and service level disadvantages were ameliorated. Profit for Jetstar went from $A 87 mm in 2006/07, before the study was commissioned, to $A 115 mm in 2007/08 and $A 137 mm in 2008/09 during a period of major industry losses.
Comments (0)
It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!
You need to log in, in order to post comments. If you don’t have an account yet, sign up now!
- Created
- June 09, 2010 14:02
- Category
- Tags
- License
- Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (What is this?)
- Formats
- H.264 Video (mp4)
- Additional Files
- Viewed
- 10231 times
More from 2009-2010
Bayer
Added almost 3 years ago | 00:40:51 | 10357 views
Prudential
Added almost 3 years ago | 00:40:18 | 11892 views
2009-2010 ISMS Practice Prize Intro...
Added almost 3 years ago | 00:04:04 | 3917 views
Inofec
Added almost 3 years ago | 00:41:18 | 14205 views
