Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sign in | Create Account

Making Globalization Work for All

10/07/2005 9:00 AM Kresge
Richard M. Locke, PhD '89, Alvin J. Siteman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Political Science; Hannah Jones, Vice President, Corporate Responsibility; Nike ; Scott Nova, Executive Director, Workers Rights Consortium

Description: These speakers share a bleak perspective: A decade's-worth of high-profile efforts to change sweatshop conditions in overseas apparel factories hasn't worked. Hannah Jones describes Nike's dismay following in-depth research at its overseas facilities, where the corporation had attempted to implement codes of conduct and compliance monitoring. The corporation made "some stark realizations," acknowledging such systemic issues as excessive overtime, unpaid wages, worker harassment and denial of workers' rights to associate freely. Real remediation of the problem, says Jones, must deal with root causes. "There's no point in Nike having 96 monitors on a factory floor day in and day out monitoring overtime, if overtime is being caused way up the supply chain." So Nike is scrutinizing its own behavior as a buyer. We must "incentivize suppliers to become part of business decision-making," she says, and convince them that creating efficiencies in a volatile market doesn't mean "squeezing labor costs" but "squeezing time to market." The worker "is central to that," and better-trained factory managers may be key.

Scott Nova agrees that major U.S. garment retailers must take corporate responsibility to heart. The pressure on foreign suppliers hasn't succeeded, he says, because "factory managers conclude correctly that if the brands were truly serious about improved working conditions, they would pay enough to make it possible for those conditions to be achieved." Instead, factories compete to pick up cheap contracts, pressure their workers to toil for pennies, and use "fakery and deception when customers send auditors to inspect labor conditions." But there is good news, he says: "The economics of apparel production are such that the problem could be fixed." Since labor costs are a minute percentage of the retail price of apparel, a tiny increase in the cost of a product passed along to a consumer could enable "brands to pay factories to reflect the true costs of compliance living wages for workers."

Host(s): Sloan School of Management, MIT Sloan School of Management

Comments (0)

It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!

You need to log in, in order to post comments. If you don’t have an account yet, sign up now!

MIT World — special events and lectures

MIT World — special events and lectures

Category: Events | Updated almost 3 years ago

Created
December 12, 2011 20:47
Category
Tags
License
All Rights Reserved (What is this?)
Additional Files


Viewed
3093 times

More from MIT World — special events and lectures

Why do We Need Differential Pricing?/Industry Perspective

Why do We Need Differential Pricing...

Added almost 3 years ago | 00:56:25 | 1580 views

Science and Technology for a Clean Energy Future

Science and Technology for a Clean ...

Added almost 3 years ago | 01:29:00 | 2767 views

Dr. King's Unfinished Agenda: A Call for Economic & Social Justice in the 21st Century

Dr. King's Unfinished Agenda: A Cal...

Added almost 3 years ago | 00:58:58 | 2693 views

Keynote Address (3)

Keynote Address (3)

Added almost 3 years ago | 00:59:49 | 1939 views

Why History Matters: International Law and the Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Why History Matters: International ...

Added almost 3 years ago | 01:36:00 | 9263 views

Innovation in Post-Launch Surveillance and Pharmaco-Vigilance <Br>(Part Two)

Innovation in Post-Launch Surveilla...

Added almost 3 years ago | 01:15:00 | 1506 views