Voices from New Orleans: Design and Planning Diaspora
10/03/2005 5:30 10-485
Lawrence Vale, SM '88, Professor and Head of the Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT School of Architecture and Planning; Gary Van Zante, Curator of Architecture & Design, MIT Museum ; John Klingman, Professor of Architecture, Tulane University ; William Barry, Senior Associate, Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott Architects, Boston ; Richard Tuttle, Professor of Art History, Tulane University ; Lawrence Jenkins, Professor of Art History, University of New Orleans ; Ellen Weiss, Professor of Architecture, Tulane University
Description:
There is general agreement that to call New Orleans home means "living with danger, dangerously," as William Barry put it. You're "relieved when you dodge the big one, but the big one was always going to come," says Lawrence Jenkens. So now that it has come, what next?
There's a consensus here that much is salvageable even in the most flooded areas of the city. Ellen Weiss worries about "the impulse to bulldoze and start from scratch with a fantasy solution," because so many of New Orleans "shotgun neighborhoods" are underappreciated historically and architecturally. John Klingman disputes the notion that the city is "gone or fine it's everything in between." Many of the older buildings are made of old growth cypress from drained swampland an extremely resilient wood that could "endure or be reused in many ways." But, he says, the people are in limbo, and the infrastructure and rules are broken. The question is how to "balance repopulating with good planning." Richard Tuttle wonders if large sections of the city's outlying wetlands should be off limits to development and "brought back as natural resources." This would raise hackles in the petroleum industry, he notes. And while tourism is a top priority, William Barry worries that rebuilding can put "authenticity of place at risk." John Klingman suggests sidestepping preservation issues by constructing 100 new schools, and replacing a debilitated education system with one attractive to all economic groups. Richard Tuttle would like to see "unemployed workers learn trades and be at the center of rebuilding," but frets that Washington will cater to large and powerful financial and political interests. "This is potentially a great moment, but as someone who lives there, I've become cynical," he says.
Host(s): School of Architecture and Planning, Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Tape #: T20331
Lawrence Vale, SM '88, Professor and Head of the Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT School of Architecture and Planning; Gary Van Zante, Curator of Architecture & Design, MIT Museum ; John Klingman, Professor of Architecture, Tulane University ; William Barry, Senior Associate, Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott Architects, Boston ; Richard Tuttle, Professor of Art History, Tulane University ; Lawrence Jenkins, Professor of Art History, University of New Orleans ; Ellen Weiss, Professor of Architecture, Tulane University
Description:
There is general agreement that to call New Orleans home means "living with danger, dangerously," as William Barry put it. You're "relieved when you dodge the big one, but the big one was always going to come," says Lawrence Jenkens. So now that it has come, what next?
There's a consensus here that much is salvageable even in the most flooded areas of the city. Ellen Weiss worries about "the impulse to bulldoze and start from scratch with a fantasy solution," because so many of New Orleans "shotgun neighborhoods" are underappreciated historically and architecturally. John Klingman disputes the notion that the city is "gone or fine it's everything in between." Many of the older buildings are made of old growth cypress from drained swampland an extremely resilient wood that could "endure or be reused in many ways." But, he says, the people are in limbo, and the infrastructure and rules are broken. The question is how to "balance repopulating with good planning." Richard Tuttle wonders if large sections of the city's outlying wetlands should be off limits to development and "brought back as natural resources." This would raise hackles in the petroleum industry, he notes. And while tourism is a top priority, William Barry worries that rebuilding can put "authenticity of place at risk." John Klingman suggests sidestepping preservation issues by constructing 100 new schools, and replacing a debilitated education system with one attractive to all economic groups. Richard Tuttle would like to see "unemployed workers learn trades and be at the center of rebuilding," but frets that Washington will cater to large and powerful financial and political interests. "This is potentially a great moment, but as someone who lives there, I've become cynical," he says.
Host(s): School of Architecture and Planning, Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Tape #: T20331
Comments (0)
It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!
You need to log in, in order to post comments. If you don’t have an account yet, sign up now!
- Created
- December 12, 2011 20:55
- Category
- Tags
- License
- All Rights Reserved (What is this?)
- Formats
- H.264 Video (mp4)
- Additional Files
- Viewed
- 1256 times
More from MIT World — special events and lectures
Opening the Mind's Eye" Learning to...
Added over 1 year ago | 00:57:25 | 1713 views
TV or Not TV: That's Not the Question
Added over 1 year ago | 01:02:00 | 2221 views
Building Technology that Matters: G...
Added over 1 year ago | 00:51:43 | 1285 views
Chomsky on Gaza
Added over 1 year ago | 01:51:00 | 1822 views
Thoughts on the Evolution of Chemic...
Added over 1 year ago | 01:11:00 | 1337 views
Art and Technology
Added over 1 year ago | 01:52:00 | 1568 views
