Media in Transition 5: Copyright, Fair Use and the Cultural Commons (MIT Communications Forum)
William Uricchio, Professor of Comparative Media Studies; ; Hal Abelson, PhD '73, Class of 1922 Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, MIT School of Engineering; Pat Aufderheide, Professor, School of Communications, American University; Wendy Gordon, Professor of Law and Paul J. Liacos Scholar in Law, Boston University; Gordon Quinn, President and Founding Member, Kartemquin Films
Description: Moderator William Uricchio sets the scene for panelists' discussion of current copyright wars with a brief historical overview of copyright protection. In 1790, when news traveled by horse and carriage, copyright protection was good for 14 years. Today, when a digital, networked society enables instant transmission of data, protection lasts 70"plus years. Uricchio notes, "Bizarrely, the faster information circulates, the longer we're extending copyright protection. It seems totally at odds with where our constitution framers and case law emerged from." Copyright came into being not just as a way of protecting authors' rights, says Wendy Gordon, but as a set of liberties for the public as well. Yet exercising those liberties-especially in an age of corporate oversight of content-requires serious means. She says, "Our free speech guarantees are often not utilized to the fullest. It always seems easy to choose the second best word rather than get sued or arrested by saying exactly what you think." The more licensing of material, the more companies insist on licensing, and judicial decisions follow. Gordon's recommendation for the small player is "coalitions, courage and new customs." Gordon Quinn was part of a filmmakers' group that decided to challenge corporations and assert their right to fair use. (Definition: legally quoting somebody else's copyrighted music, pictures or words without paying or asking permission _ if it benefits society more than it hurts the copyright holder). He has practiced self censorship out of fear of lawsuits, in one case dropping a scene of immigrants singing "Happy Birthday" in Spanish because it would have involved a significant clearance payment. To his films' detriment, Quinn often eliminated or edited around questionable copyright content. Pat Aufderheide (who speaks last in this panel) describes how her group, the Center for Social Media, helped organize filmmakers to challenge, by action and by persuasion, the standards established by music, motion picture and publishing industries around copyright. She discovered remarkable consensus among artists about what constituted reasonable use of preexisting, copyrighted material, including quoting for critique, quoting pop culture to make a point, capturing incidental material and using historical material to make points. With the resulting handbook, the Documentary Filmmakers' Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use, filmmakers began to invoke their own guidelines. Today, after 18 months, says Aufderheide, major U.S. film insurers have begun to accept fair use claims. Hal Abelson offers his sense of how copyright concerns constrict life at the academy. MIT, he says, has begun putting fences up around its own course materials, including the most basic and central of thinkers. For instance, it has limited online, published versions of Aristotle, Pascal and Fermat to students in a particular course, for a single semester. Huge expense goes into getting permissions from faculty, and university lawyers are so concerned about offending copyright holders that they bar reams of material from MIT's OpenCourseWare site. Abelson believes these fences risk "destroying the university as an intellectual community," and recommends using open content (granting Creative Commons licenses) as much as possible, as well as aggressively exercising fair use.
About the Speaker(s): William Uricchio received his Ph.D. in cinema studies from New York University in 1982 and comes to MIT from the Institute for Media and Re/Presentation at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, where he was department chair. He currently directs a five"year cultural identity project in the European Science Foundation Changing Media Changing Europe initiative.
A Fulbright and Humboldt fellow, Uricchio has published widely on early television, early cinema and their emergence as cultural forms, including Reframing Culture: The Case of the Vitagraph Quality Films(1993); Die Anf_nge des deutschen Fernsehens: Kritische Ann_herungen an die Entwicklung bis 1945(1993); The Many Lives of the Batman: Critical Approaches to a Superhero and His Media (1991); and "The Nickel Madness": The Struggle to Control New York City's Nickelodeons in 1907_1913. His most recent books include Media Cultures (2006 Heidelberg), on responses to media in post 9/11 Germany and the US, and We Europeans? Media, New Collectivities and Europe(forthcoming).
Host(s): School of Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences, Communications Forum
It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!
You need to log in, in order to post comments.
More from MIT Communications Forum
Added over 4 years ago | 01:54:00 | 13262 views
Added over 4 years ago | 01:59:00 | 9177 views
Added over 4 years ago | 02:02:00 | 17635 views
Added over 4 years ago | 01:55:00 | 12652 views
Added over 4 years ago | 01:33:00 | 7293 views
Added over 4 years ago | 01:27:00 | 4657 views