The Second Law and Cosmology
Max Tegmark, Associate Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, MIT
Description: In spite of its old age, the Second Law of Thermodynamics "is alive and kicking," says Max Tegmark, stimulating research on "really, really big puzzles." In Tegmark's case, "big" encompasses the cosmos, and investigating the entropy of the universe offers one path into understanding "how we started out."
Tegmark frames his talk with paradoxical questions: Why is entropy so low, and why is entropy so high? The first question is "crucial to understanding the arrow of time," and involves the microscopic definition of entropy. 13.7 billion years after the Big Bang, entropy in the observable universe is in "the ballpark of 1089 bits -- crudely speaking, a google." This is much lower than the theoretical limit to how much entropy our cosmos could contain. Also, Tegmark wonders, why has our solar system ended up so far from thermal equilibrium, since when the universe was younger, the temperature was almost the same everywhere?
It turns out that in cosmology, unlike classical physics, atoms start out at uniform density and end up, abetted by gravity, "clumpy," with gas getting denser and forming stars. Tegmark shows a supercomputer simulation of this process, which depicts the evolution of a universe with galaxies and solar systems like our own. Different temperatures in the universe aren't due to magic, he says, just Einstein's theory of gravity and basic gas physics.
But, Tegmark ponders, why was the universe uniform in the beginning? One "crazy sounding answer" involves inflation. A tiny region of space much smaller than an atom, which is very uniform and very dense, begins to expand exponentially, until it makes up all space in our known universe. It gets weirder. Tegmark invokes inflation to explain not only the low entropy of the cosmos, but its high entropy as well. That same 1089 bits can also be viewed as "such a big number that it suggeststhat we're in some kind of multiverse, or some much larger reality than what we can observe." The initial conditions that make up these 1089 bits "just tell us where in space we live, our address in space." We should call the Big Bang "not the beginning but the end of inflation in this part of space. If we zoom out in the universe, we should expect to see much more entropy." If you don't get this intuitively, that's OK, Tegmark reassures us, but "if we categorically reject ideas in science just because they feel crazy, we will probably reject whatever the correct theory is, too."
About the Speaker(s): Max Tegmark left Sweden in 1990 after receiving his B.Sc. in Physics from the Royal Institute of Technology (he'd earned a B.A. in Economics the previous year at the Stockholm School of Economics). He studied physics at the University of California, Berkeley, earning his M.A. in 1992, and Ph.D. in 1994.
Tegmark then became a research associate with the Max"Planck"Institut fôr Physik in Munich. In 1996 he headed back to the U.S. as a Hubble Fellow and member of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. Several years later, Tegmark became an Assistant Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, where he received tenure in 2003. He moved to MIT in September 2004, along with his wife, fellow astrophysicist Angelica de Oliveira"Costa.
Tegmark has received numerous awards for his research, including a Packard Fellowship (2001"06), Cottrell Scholar Award (2002"07), and an NSF Career grant (2002"07). His work with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey collaboration on galaxy clustering shared the first prize in Science magazine's "Breakthrough of the Year: 2003."
Host(s): School of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering
It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!
More from MIT World — special events and lectures
Added over 3 years ago | 01:29:00 | 8655 views
Added over 3 years ago | 00:39:48 | 1990 views
Added over 3 years ago | 01:16:00 | 2141 views
Added over 3 years ago | 00:48:17 | 2445 views
Added over 3 years ago | 01:02:00 | 6919 views
Added over 3 years ago | 00:46:08 | 2682 views