U.S. - Iran Relations
Jim Walsh, Research Associate, SSP MIT; Suzanne DiMaggio, Global Policy Director, Asia Society; Stephen Heintz, President, Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Barry Posen, Ford International Professor of Political Science at MIT, Director Security Studies Program
Description: While Barack Obama has rejected the Bush administration's harsh stance toward Iran, panelists warn that we're far from the start of fruitful relations, and that achieving real diplomacy will paradoxically require both patience and a sense of urgency.
Suzanna DiMaggioobserves the U.S. seeking "areas of common interest and managing areas of profound differences" with Iran, moving "well beyond a change in language" to concrete and profound shifts in policy, such as recognizing Iran's right to a peaceful nuclear program; curtailing support for Iranian opposition groups; and reaching out for Iran's cooperation on Afghanistan. DiMaggio says Afghanistan may prove key to building the foundations of a relationship, since Iran is concerned about halting the spread of violent fundamentalism and curtailing drug trafficking. The way forward, she suggests, involves approaching Iran in a "direct and sustained way to clarify U.S. intentions in the region while building confidence and trust," which "will require each side to exercise great restraint," and an acceptance that there will be frequent setbacks.
Jim Walsh describes recent U.S. actions toward Iran as "scene setting," with such moves as dropping preconditions for discussing Iran's nuclear program, and discouraging Israel from contemplating a preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. But "Iran is cautious," with its government demonstrating "a certain schizophrenia" -- hopefulness and curiosity about Barack Obama, but skepticism about the U.S. pursuing substantive change. Tactical cooperation with Iran around Afghanistan and the drug trade appears to Walsh a better starting point for discussions than Iran's nuclear program. He says, "Barack Obama may speak with a nicer tone, offer greater incentives, but if at the end of the day, he insists on no centrifuges, we will end up at the same outcome as before." Substantial movement will take months, and all the while, Iran will continue to build centrifuges. Walsh sees a dilemma for the president: he must attempt to build confidence by moving slowly, but the "best chance for success is if Obama acts early and boldly while he still has the power of public opinion behind him domestically and internationallyIt won't last forever. Stephen Heintz points out that "Iran is in the center of a set of issues of direct national interest to the U.S.," including Middle East peace, the war on terror, regional stability and oil. The problem is that in trying to find points of intersection with Iran, each nation "has very little knowledge of the other," as well as bad memories (the hostage crisis of 1979, the U.S. support of the Shah). This "only reinforces a relationship based on suspicion." While Barack Obama "has done a superb job at creating different atmospherics," there is a huge debate underway within policy circles, as different groups jockey to shape Iran policy. Heintz doesn't expect much movement until after the Iranian elections, but hopes that the restart of multilateral talks, and discussions about regional security and drug trade will help free both nations of the "paranoia and fear" that's built up over time.
About the Speaker(s): Barry R. Posen serves on the Executive Committee of Seminar XXI, an educational program for senior military officers, government officials and business executives in the national security policy community. He has written two books, Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Risks and The Sources of Military Doctrine, which won two awards: The American Political Science Association's Woodrow Wilson Foundation Book Award, and Ohio State University's Edward J. Furniss Jr. Book Award.
Posen is also the author of numerous articles, including "The Case for Restraint," The American Interest, (November/December 2007) and "Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony," International Security, (Summer, 2003.) He has been a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow; Rockefeller Foundation International Affairs Fellow; Guest Scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies; Woodrow Wilson Center Fellow, Smithsonian Institution; and most recently, Transatlantic Fellow of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. Posen's current research interests include U.S. national security policy, the security policy of the European Union, the organization and employment of military force, great power intervention into civil conflicts, and innovation in the U.S. Army, 1970"1980.
Host(s): School of Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences, Center for International Studies
It looks like no one has posted a comment yet. You can be the first!
You need to log in, in order to post comments.
More from MIT World — special events and lectures
Added 4 years ago | 01:01:00 | 5220 views
Added 4 years ago | 01:52:00 | 3244 views
Added 4 years ago | 00:47:19 | 4923 views
Added 4 years ago | 01:25:00 | 2118 views
Added over 4 years ago | 01:15:00 | 3359 views
Added 4 years ago | 00:51:56 | 6754 views